
November 23, 2021
The Psychology Of Transport, Google Maps & Bear Attacks | Rory Sutherland on Modern Wisdom with Chris Williamson
Check out the Modern Wisdom podcast page
Key Takeaways
- Economists and technologists have ignored the qualitative metrics that influence our psychological motivations involved in transportation
- “These reductionist metrics effectively treat humans as though they were freight, they turned transport into a logistics problem which free of psychology” – Rory Sutherland
- Google maps only provide route options for speed and price, why not ease and beauty?
- We are hitting the law of diminishing returns in the correlation between punctuality and passenger happiness
- Reasoning can be wrong even when it leads to the correct conclusion
- People commonly obey without knowing why they obey
- People don’t revert back from technology once they are persuaded to accept it
- “There is a certain category of technology which isn’t self-explanatory but is self-revelatory” – Rory Sutherland
- “One reason political polarization tends to be confined to the young and(/or) stupid is this: anyone over 35 possessed of any observational nous has noticed that there is no correlation between political allegiance and basic decency as a human being” – Rory Sutherland recent tweet
Intro
- Rory Sutherland (@rorysutherland) is the Vice Chairman of Ogilvy Advertising and the author of newly released book: Transport for Humans: Are We Nearly There Yet?. In this episode, Chris and Rory discuss the psychological factors involved in transportation, how reasoning can be wrong in a correct conclusion, and more.
- Chris Williamson (@ChrisWillx)
Transport for Humans
- Transport for Humans: Are We Nearly There Yet? by Rory Sutherland and Pete Dyson
- We generally over-optimize transport around speed, capacity, and function (things you can measure)
- “These reductionist metrics effectively treat humans as though they were freight, they turned transport into a logistics problem which free of psychology” – Rory Sutherland
- This model effectively eliminates the plausibility that transportation can be enjoyable and/or productive
- We under-optimize transport around enjoyment, regret, fairness, and other qualitative metrics
- SCARF – Status, Certainty, Autonomy, Relatedness, Fairness
- Humans care deeply about these things but economists fail to use them in their equations
- Example: It makes you angrier to miss a plane departure by 5 minutes than by 30 minutes
- SCARF – Status, Certainty, Autonomy, Relatedness, Fairness
- We are hitting the law of diminishing returns in the correlation between punctuality and passenger happiness
- We are willing to sacrifice slight deviations in time for comfort and features
- We generally over-optimize transport around speed, capacity, and function (things you can measure)
Psychology of Electric Cars
- Electric cars change the psychology of driving
- Regenerative braking sends fuel back to the tank as a result of the energy created through breaking – we may not be all that mad about having to slam on the breaks
- Due to range limitations, you drive less aggressively to preserve energy
- “I’ve never been pissed off by someone driving an electric car” – Rory Sutherland
- Owners of certain brands of cars often take on a unique driving personality
- Caring about the environment is traditionally a good indication of being a good person
Google Maps
- Google Maps doesn’t have many route variations, all of them focus on speed and price
- It’s system ignores other psychological motives to travel:
- Ease – sustain a single speed for the most amount of time, limited turns and stops
- Beauty – the route that provides the most scenic view
Reasoning and Conclusions
- “There is often a problem with perfectly well-intentioned movements” – Rory Sutherland
- Rory’s take on environmentalism is that there is a 20% chance that Nigel Lawson is right – climate change through carbon emissions is a scientific mistake
- But even if we’re wrong, the reduction of carbon heuristic can still be beneficial
- Electric cars cause less noise pollution
- Reasoning can be wrong even when it leads to the correct conclusion
- But even if we’re wrong, the reduction of carbon heuristic can still be beneficial
- There is a children’s poem that states: if you step on a crack, a bear will attack (or break your mother’s back in an alternate version)
- Based on years of evolution, children are naturally afraid of wild animals
- The poem encourages the children to walk carefully in the street as a byproduct; not because they are afraid of traffic but because they are afraid of bears
- Heuristic campaigns are utilized in a variety of industries like advertising
- The only way they work is if people obey without knowing why they obey
Technology
- “There is a certain category of technology which isn’t self-explanatory but is self-revelatory” – Rory Sutherland
- People don’t revert back from technology once they are persuaded to accept it
- Rory provides a couple of ideas that might follow this timeline:
- Glass-sided toaster – why would you not like to observe the whole process?
- Owning two dishwashers – clean and dirty dishwashers that alternate as they serve as substitutes for the storage of your dishes
Rory’s Recent Political Tweet
- “One reason political polarization tends to be confined to the young and(/or) stupid is this: anyone over 35 possessed of any observational nous has noticed that there is no correlation between political allegiance and basic decency as a human being” – Rory Sutherland recent tweet
- There are good and bad people that exist on every part of the political spectrum
- People on Twitter often willfully misunderstand what you’re saying
Rory’s Opinion on Covid
- In Rory’s opinion, it seems fair to do a cost-benefit analysis of vaccinating the young but older and elderly people are being irresponsible not being vaccinated
- He believes masking and vaccination are a duty to his fellow man, regardless of health concerns, he wants to make sure his company is comfortable
- Rory thinks the fear of needles is actually relevant anti-vaxx reasoning that people cover up with other excuses